Wie is de vijand?

Een van de redenen waarom het interessant is om het politiek-ideologische debat in de VS in de gaten te houden, is de onnavolgbare stroom interessante publicaties. Een boek dat vorig jaar reeds gepubliceerd werd is "Civilization and its enemies: the next stage of history" van de auteur Lee Harris.
Enkele citaten:
"Forgetfulness occurs when those who have been long accustomed to civilized order can no longer remember a time in which they had to wonder whether their crops would grow to maturity without being stolen or their children sold into slavery by a victorious foe . . . They forget that in time of danger, in the face of the enemy, they must trust and confide in each other, or perish . . . They forget, in short, that there has ever been a category of human experience called the enemy."
"That, before 9/11, was what had happened to us. The very concept of the enemy had been banished from our moral and political vocabulary. An enemy was just a friend we hadn't done enough for yet. Or perhaps there had been a misunderstanding, or an oversight on our part -- something that we could correct . . ."
"Our first task is therefore to try to grasp what the concept of the enemy really means. The enemy is someone who is willing to die in order to kill you. And while it is true that the enemy always hates us for a reason, it is his reason, and not ours."
De stelling van Harris dat de vijand iemand is die om ons te doden, bereid is zelf gedood te worden, doet onvermijdelijk denken aan de analyse van Carl Schmitt met zijn Todes- & Tötungsbereitschaft (in Der Begriff des Politischen).
Lees het essay "Al Qaeda's Fantasy Ideology" in Policy Review (augustus-september 2002) dat opgenomen werd in het boek.
Bestel "Civilization and its enemies":

16:33 Gepost door Jan Lievens | Permalink | Commentaren (0) |  Facebook |

De commentaren zijn gesloten.